United States Announces World Police Force - Freedom Outpost
United States Announces World Police Force - Freedom Outpost
The revolutionary development of modern
weapons within a world divided by serious ideological differences has
produced a crisis in human history. In order to overcome the danger of
nuclear war now confronting mankind, the United States has introduced at
the Sixteenth General Assembly of the United Nations a Program for General and Complete Disarmament in a Peaceful World.
This new program provides for the progressive reduction of the
war-making capabilities of nations and the simultaneous strengthening of
international institutions to settle disputes and maintain the peace.
It sets forth a series of comprehensive measures which can and should be
taken in order to bring about a world in which there will be freedom
from war and security for all states. It is based on three principles
deemed essential to the achievement of practical progress in the
disarmament field:
First, there must be immediate disarmament action:
A strenuous and uninterrupted effort must be made toward the goal of
general and complete disarmament; at the same time, it is important that
specific measures be put into effect as soon as possible.
Second, all disarmament obligations must be subject to effective international controls:
The control organization must have the manpower, facilities, and
effectiveness to assure that limitations or reductions take place as
agreed. It must also be able to certify to all states that retained
forces and armaments do not exceed those permitted at any stage of the
disarmament process.
Third, adequate peace-keeping machinery must be established:
There is an inseparable relationship between the scaling down of
national armaments on the one hand and the building up of international
peace-keeping machinery and institutions on the other. Nations are
unlikely to shed their means of self-protection in the absence of
alternative ways to safeguard their legitimate interests. This can only
be achieved through the progressive strengthening of international
institutions under the United Nations and by creating a United Nations
Peace Force to enforce the peace as the disarmament process proceeds.
There follows a summary of the principal provisions of the United States Program for General and Complete Disarmament in a Peaceful World. The full text of the program is contained in an appendix to this pamphlet.
SUMMARY
DISARMAMENT GOAL AND OBJECTIVES
The over-all goal of the United States is a free, secure, and
peaceful world of independent states adhering to common standards of
justice and international conduct and subjecting the use of force to the
rule of law; a world which has achieved general and complete
disarmament under effective international control; and a world in which
adjustment to change takes place in accordance with the principles of
the United Nations.
In order to make possible the achievement of that
goal, the program sets forth the following specific objectives toward
which nations should direct their efforts:
The negotiating states are called upon to develop the program into a
detailed plan for general and complete disarmament and to continue their
efforts without interruption until the whole program has been achieved.
To this end, they are to seek the widest possible area of agreement at
the earliest possible date. At the same time, and without prejudice to
progress on the disarmament program, they are to seek agreement on those
immediate measures that would contribute to the common security of
nations and that could facilitate and form part of the total program.
GOVERNING PRINCIPLES
The program sets forth a series of general principles to guide the negotiating states in their work. These make clear that:
The program provides for progressive disarmament steps to take place
in three stages and for the simultaneous strengthening of international
institutions.
FIRST STAGE
The first stage contains measures which would significantly reduce
the capabilities of nations to wage aggressive war. Implementation of
this stage would mean that:
The second stage contains a series of measures which would bring
within sight a world in which there would be freedom from war.
Implementation of all measures in the second stage would mean:
During the third stage of the program, the states of the world,
building on the experience and confidence gained in successfully
implementing the measures of the first two stages, would take final
steps toward the goal of a world in which:
DECLARATION ON DISARMAMENT
THE UNITED STATES PROGRAM
FOR GENERAL AND COMPLETE DISARMAMENT
IN A PEACEFUL WORLD
The Nations of the world,
Conscious of the crisis in
human history produced by the revolutionary development of modern
weapons within a world divided by serious ideological differences;
Determined to
save present and succeeding generations from the scourge of war and the
dangers and burdens of the arms race and to create conditions in which
all peoples can strive freely and peacefully to fulfill their basic
aspirations;
Declare their goal to be: A free, secure, and
peaceful world of independent states adhering to common standards of
justice and international conduct and subjecting the use of force to the
rule of law; a world where adjustment to change takes place in
accordance with the principles of the United Nations; a world where
there shall be a permanent state of general and complete disarmament
under effective international control and where the resources of nations
shall be devoted to man's material, cultural, and spiritual advance;
Set forth as the objectives of a program of general and complete disarmament in a peaceful world:
(a)
The disbanding of all national armed forces and the prohibition of
their reestablishment in any form whatsoever other than those required
to preserve internal order and for contributions to a United Nations
Peace Force;
(b) The elimination from national arsenals of all
armaments, including all weapons of mass destruction and the means for
their delivery, other than those required for a United Nations Peace
Force and for maintaining internal order;
(c) The establishment and
effective operation of an International Disarmament Organization within
the framework of the United Nations to ensure compliance at all times
with all disarmament obligations;
(d) The institution of effective
means for the enforcement of international agreements, for the
settlement of disputes, and for the maintenance of peace in accordance
with the principles of the United Nations.
Call on the negotiating states:
(a)
To develop the outline program set forth below into an agreed plan for
general and complete disarmament and to continue their efforts without
interruption until the whole program has been achieved;
(b) To this end to seek to attain the widest possible area of agreement at the earliest possible date;
(c)
Also to seek --- without prejudice to progress on the disarmament
program --- agreement on those immediate measures that would contribute
to the common security of nations and that could facilitate and form a
part of that program.
Affirm that disarmament negotiations should be guided by the following principles:
(a)
Disarmament shall take place as rapidly as possible until it is
completed in stages containing balanced, phased and safeguarded
measures, with each measure and stage to be carried out in an agreed
period of time.
(b) Compliance with all disarmament obligations shall
be effectively verified from their entry into force. Verification
arrangements shall be instituted progressively and in such a manner as
to verify not only that agreed limitations or reductions take place but
also that retained armed forces and armaments do not exceed agreed
levels at any stage.
(c) Disarmament shall take place in a manner
that will not affect adversely the security of any state, whether or not
a party to an international agreement or treaty.
(d) As states
relinquish their arms, the United Nations shall be progressively
strengthened in order to improve its capacity to assure international
security and the peaceful settlement of differences as well as to
facilitate the development of international cooperation in common tasks
for the benefit of mankind.
(e) Transition from one stage of
disarmament to the next shall take place as soon as all the measures in
the preceding stage have been carried out and effective verification is
continuing and as soon as the arrangements that have been agreed to be
necessary for the next stage have been instituted.
Agree upon the following outline program for achieving general and complete disarmament:
STAGE I
A. To Establish an International Disarmament Organization:
(a)
An International Disarmament Organization (IDO) shall be established
within the framework of the United Nations upon entry into force of the
agreement. Its functions shall be expanded progressively as required for
the effective verification of the disarmament program.
(b) The IDO
shall have: (1) a General Conference of all the parties; (2) a
Commission consisting of representatives of all the major powers as
permanent members and certain other states on a rotating basis; and (3)
an Administrator who will administer the Organization subject to the
direction of the Commission and who will have the authority, staff, and
finances adequate to assure effective impartial implementation of the
functions of the Organization.
(c) The IDO shall: (1) ensure
compliance with the obligations undertaken by verifying the execution of
measures agreed upon; (2) assist the states in developing the details
of agreed further verification and disarmament measures; (3) provide for
the establishment of such bodies as may be necessary for working out
the details of further measures provided for in the program and for such
other expert study groups as may be required to give continuous study
to the problems of disarmament; (4) receive reports on the progress of
disarmament and verification arrangements and determine the transition
from one stage to the next.
B. To Reduce Armed Forces and Armaments:
(a)
Force levels shall be limited to 2.1 million each for the U.S. and
U.S.S.R. and to appropriate levels not exceeding 2.1 million each for
all other militarily significant states. Reductions to the agreed levels
will proceed by equitable, proportionate, and verified steps.
(b)
Levels of armaments of prescribed types shall be reduced by equitable
and balanced steps. The reductions shall be accomplished by transfers of
armaments to depots supervised by the IDO. When, at specified periods
during the Stage I reduction process, the states party to the agreement
have agreed that the armaments and armed forces are at prescribed
levels, the armaments in depots shall be destroyed or converted to
peaceful uses.
(c) The production of agreed types of armaments shall be limited.
(d)
A Chemical, Biological, Radiological (CBR) Experts Commission shall be
established within the IDO for the purpose of examining and reporting on
the feasibility and means for accomplishing the verifiable reduction
and eventual elimination of CBR weapons stockpiles and the halting of
their production.
C. To Contain and Reduce the Nuclear Threat:
(a) States that have not acceded to a treaty effectively prohibiting the testing of nuclear weapons shall do so.
(b) The production of fissionable materials for use in weapons shall be stopped.
(c)
Upon the cessation of production of fissionable materials for use in
weapons, agreed initial quantities of fissionable materials from past
production shall be transferred to non-weapons purposes.
(d) Any
fissionable materials transferred between countries for peaceful uses of
nuclear energy shall be subject to appropriate safeguards to be
developed in agreement with the IAEA.
(e) States owning nuclear
weapons shall not relinquish control of such weapons to any nation not
owning them and shall not transmit to any such nation information or
material necessary for their manufacture. States not owning nuclear
weapons shall not manufacture such weapons, attempt to obtain control of
such weapons belonging to other states, or seek or receive information
or materials necessary for their manufacture.
(f) A Nuclear Experts
Commission consisting of representatives of the nuclear states shall be
established within the IDO for the purpose of examining and reporting on
the feasibility and means for accomplishing the verified reduction and
eventual elimination of nuclear weapons stockpiles.
D. To Reduce Strategic Nuclear Weapons Delivery Vehicles:
(a)
Strategic nuclear weapons delivery vehicles in specified categories and
agreed types of weapons designed to counter such vehicles shall be
reduced to agreed levels by equitable and balanced steps. The reduction
shall be accomplished in each step by transfers to depots supervised by
the IDO of vehicles that are in excess of levels agreed upon for each
step. At specified periods during the Stage I reduction process, the
vehicles that have been placed under the supervision of the IDO shall be
destroyed or converted to peaceful uses.
(b) Production of agreed
categories of strategic nuclear weapons delivery vehicles and agreed
types of weapons designed to counter such vehicles shall be discontinued
or limited.
(c) Testing of agreed categories of strategic nuclear
weapons delivery vehicles and agreed types of weapons designed to
counter such vehicles shall be limited or halted.
E. To Promote the Peaceful Use of Outer Space:
(a) The placing into orbit or stationing in outer space of weapons capable of producing mass destruction shall be prohibited.
(b)
States shall give advance notification to participating states and to
the IDO of launchings of space vehicles and missiles, together with the
track of the vehicle.
F. To Reduce the Risks of War by Accident, Miscalculation, and Surprise Attack:
(a)
States shall give advance notification to the participating states and
to the IDO of major military movements and maneuvers, on a scale as may
be agreed, which might give rise to misinterpretation or cause alarm and
induce countermeasures. The notification shall include the geographic
areas to be used and the nature, scale and time span of the event.
(b)
There shall be established observation posts at such locations as major
ports, railway centers, motor highways, and air bases to report on
concentrations and movements of military forces.
(c) There shall also
be established such additional inspection arrangements to reduce the
danger of surprise attack as may be agreed.
(d) An international
commission shall be established immediately within the IDO to examine
and make recommendations on the possibility of further measures to
reduce the risks of nuclear war by accident, miscalculation, or failure
of communication.
G. To Keep the Peace:
(a) States shall reaffirm
their obligations under the U.N. Charter to refrain from the threat or
use of any type of armed force--including nuclear, conventional, or
CBR--contrary to the principles of the U.N. Charter.
(b) States shall agree to refrain from indirect aggression and subversion against any country.
(c)
States shall use all appropriate processes for the peaceful settlement
of disputes and shall seek within the United Nations further
arrangements for the peaceful settlement of international disputes and
for the codification and progressive development of international law.
(d) States shall develop arrangements in Stage I for the establishment in Stage II of a U.N. Peace Force.
(e)
A U.N. peace observation group shall be staffed with a standing cadre
of observers who could be dispatched to investigate any situation which
might constitute a threat to or breach of the peace.
STAGE II
A. International Disarmament Organization:
The
powers and responsibilities of the IDO shall be progressively enlarged
in order to give it the capabilities to verify the measures undertaken
in Stage II.
B. To Further Reduce Armed Forces and Armaments:
(a)
Levels of forces for the U.S., U.S.S.R., and other militarily
significant states shall be further reduced by substantial amounts to
agreed levels in equitable and balanced steps.
(b) Levels of
armaments of prescribed types shall be further reduced by equitable and
balanced steps. The reduction shall be accomplished by transfers of
armaments to depots supervised by the IDO. When, at specified periods
during the Stage II reduction process, the parties have agreed that the
armaments and armed forces are at prescribed levels, the armaments in
depots shall be destroyed or converted to peaceful uses.
(c) There shall be further agreed restrictions on the production of armaments.
(d) Agreed military bases and facilities wherever they are located shall be dismantled or converted to peaceful uses.
(e)
Depending upon the findings of the Experts Commission on CBR weapons,
the production of CBR weapons shall be halted, existing stocks
progressively reduced, and the resulting excess quantities destroyed or
converted to peaceful uses.
C. To Further Reduce the Nuclear Threat:
Stocks
of nuclear weapons shall be progressively reduced to the minimum levels
which can be agreed upon as a result of the findings of the Nuclear
Experts Commission; the resulting excess of fissionable material shall
be transferred to peaceful purposes.
D. To Further Reduce Strategic Nuclear Weapons Delivery Vehicles:
Further
reductions in the stocks of strategic nuclear weapons delivery vehicles
and agreed types of weapons designed to counter such vehicles shall be
carried out in accordance with the procedure outlined in Stage I.
E. To Keep the Peace:
During Stage II, states
shall develop further the peace-keeping processes of the United Nations,
to the end that the United Nations can effectively in Stage III deter
or suppress any threat or use of force in violation of the purposes and
principles of the United Nations:
(a) States shall agree upon
strengthening the structure, authority, and operation of the United
Nations so as to assure that the United Nations will be able effectively
to protect states against threats to or breaches of the peace.
(b) The U.N. Peace Force shall be established and progressively strengthened.
(c)
States shall also agree upon further improvements and developments in
rules of international conduct and in processes for peaceful settlement
of disputes and differences.
STAGE III
By the time Stage II has been completed, the confidence produced
through a verified disarmament program, the acceptance of rules of
peaceful international behavior, and the development of strengthened
international peace-keeping processes within the framework of the U.N.
should have reached a point where the states of the world can move
forward to Stage III. In Stage III progressive controlled disarmament
and continuously developing principles and procedures of international
law would proceed to a point where no state would have the military
power to challenge the progressively strengthened U.N. Peace Force and
all international disputes would be settled according to the agreed
principles of international conduct.
The progressive steps to be taken during the final phase of the
disarmament program would be directed toward the attainment of a world
in which:
(a) States would retain only those forces, non-nuclear
armaments, and establishments required for the purpose of maintaining
internal order; they would also support and provide agreed manpower for a
U.N. Peace Force.
(b) The U.N. Peace Force, equipped with agreed types and quantities of armaments, would be fully functioning.
(c)
The manufacture of armaments would be prohibited except for those of
agreed types and quantities to be used by the U.N. Peace Force and those
required to maintain internal order. All other armaments would be
destroyed or converted to peaceful purposes.
(d) The peace-keeping
capabilities of the United Nations would be sufficiently strong and the
obligations of all states under such arrangements sufficiently
far-reaching as to assure peace and the just settlement of differences
in a disarmed world.
The United States did in fact announce a world police force, and they did it more than 50 years ago. Today it is called NATO.
The above text is copied verbatim from U.S. Department of State Publication 7277, Freedom from War: The United States Program for General and Complete Disarmament in a Peaceful World,
Disarmament Series 5, Office of Public Services, Bureau of Public
Affairs, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C., O 609147.
If you are unfamiliar with this document and don't believe its authenticity, here is a direct link sourced from the United States Senate's official government website.
This document was drafted by former U.S. National Security Advisor
and Secretary of State, Heinz Alfred Kissinger, a German national and
Soviet deep cover agent (code named "Bor") who had changed his birth
name to "Henry" to evade suspicion of his conspiratorial espionage. State Department Publication 7277 was personally delivered to the United Nations by President John F. Kennedy in September of 1961.
It is the official policy of the United States of America, and
reveals the plans of the federal government of the United States to
retroactively transfer its military forces to the United Nations. It
specifically outlines an ongoing agenda to combine the police and
military forces of the United States of America with Russia in three
distinct stages, into what will be the "peace-keeping" forces of the new
world government under the authority of the United Nations bureaucracy.
"The meaning of peace," explained socialist revolutionary Karl Marx, "is the absence of opposition to socialism."
That statement—which I have often cited due to its extreme
importance—holds a lot of weight, because anyone who has made an honest
study of the United Nations knows that it was founded by socialists, and the Charter of the United Nations—an almost word-for-word duplicate of the Constitution of the Soviet Union—was penned by socialists. The truth is, the Charter of the United Nations is slated by its framers to be the "World Constitution."
Ultimately, according to the collectivist plan introduced by the U.S.
State Department, the only military force will be a world police force
under the United Nations in sufficient numbers with state-of-the-art
technology to field overwhelming force against any perceived threat to
the world supra-government. The military of the United States of America
is currently filling the requirement. It is currently in stage two, and
moving into the final stage of the plan.
Understanding the successes to date since the introduction of 7277, the Senior Officer Corps of all of our military forces have betrayed their Oaths of allegiance
to the Constitution for the United States of America, the Supreme Law
of our guaranteed Republican form of government, and have joined the
conspiracy to end our national sovereignty and unite with other U.N.
member states under a totalitarian socialist world government.
"E Pluribus Unum." Out of Many, One.
You see, none of this is new. This subject is what originally
compelled me to write and disseminate information, and I have written
extensively and documented the structural build-up of a tyrannical
military police state/martial law scenario in this country, and
enumerated the punishments for treason as defined in the law [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11].
The particular agenda to create a world police force has been (at
least) 54 years in the planning stages, and probably a long time before
that. Considering this, the record-breaking nationwide Special Forces
domestic operation Jade Helm 15 to "master the human domain" [1][2][3][4],
the U.S. Army Special Operations Command's ARSOF Operating Concept 2022
to "operationalize the CONUS [Continental United States] base" [1][2], the DoD's National Guard State Partnership Program
involving 74 nations around the globe evolving "from a 1991 U.S.
European command decision," the Justice Department's March 12th announcement to federalize local law enforcement [1][2], are all just extensions of the stated long-term agenda of the United States.
And for whatever reason you think this may all be transpiring—whether it be preparations for a forthcoming economic collapse, resulting civil unrest and martial law; a Continuity of Government program of the Pentagon to shore-up defenses in preparation for World War III; a federal takeover of the States and disarming of lawful gun owners, purging of political opponents and military commanders; relocating military infrastructure to avoid a forthcoming earthquake, super-volcano, pole shift, the incoming 3,600-year orbit 10th planet discovered in 1979 by the Pioneer space probe, or other extreme weather event; another
chapter in blurring the lines between the police and military,
desensitizing and normalizing the aberrant shame of a standing army on
the streets of America following the end of Posse Comitatus; an operational test of 4th generation warfare or a giant psychological operation of perception management; or all the above—whatever reason you may attach to this burgeoning police state,
there is no question that it is happening right before our eyes in
accordance with a long-established official framework of documentation,
and obviously for a very specific reason.
Being a veteran of the Armed Forces of the United States, I know that
we train where we fight and fight where we train. This is all taking
place not for training purposes for the future prospect of foreign
deployment, as its public relations arms claim, but for domestic
operations in "unconventional warfare" on U.S. soil. After
all, employing the assistance of "Interagency Partners" (the DHS, FBI,
DEA and local law enforcement) who have no explainable precedent in
foreign war as these agencies have no foreign operating charter, has
no adequate demonstrable convention.
$4.2 billion worth of military surplus has been handed over to local
police forces by the federal government in recent years. My local police
department received a whopping $1.6 million in surplus weapons and military-grade hardware. Many combat veterans have even exclaimed how American cops are more heavily armed than they were as front-line soldiers in active war zones. Hundreds
of millions of taxpayer dollars are being spent annually to outgun the
average American citizen, to position the federal U.S. military forces,
agencies and their auxiliary local and state law enforcement partners
throughout the continental United States to eliminate the opposition of
the United Nations disarmament agenda as their peace-keeping force, and
to prepare for a major event to coincide with multiple flashpoints.
Having discussed this agenda
with every active duty military member, veteran and police personnel I
know, we all agree unanimously that the federal government of the United
States is terrified of We the People getting fed-up, or something else
(or both), and is actively planning in concert with local and state law
enforcement agencies, for some big forthcoming trigger event. And whatever it is, it's imminent.
I hope you are likewise shoring up your defenses, because one thing
is for sure, something big is about to happen that will change our way
of life in this country. If we allow our Creator-endowed Freedom to be
stripped, then we will never get it back. Truthfully, if you aren't
willing to die in the defense of it, then you probably never deserved it
anyway.
And if you are making a
concerted effort to get right with the Almighty, then you know as I do
that you have nothing to fear, for if you die in the defense of God and
of the principles and ideals which blessed this nation with greatness
from its inception, then you will be the only one in the world who is
truly free.
Source
Read more at http://freedomoutpost.com/2015/06/united-states-announces-world-police-force/#SAC1IsZP6ftt3oU8.99
weapons within a world divided by serious ideological differences has
produced a crisis in human history. In order to overcome the danger of
nuclear war now confronting mankind, the United States has introduced at
the Sixteenth General Assembly of the United Nations a Program for General and Complete Disarmament in a Peaceful World.
This new program provides for the progressive reduction of the
war-making capabilities of nations and the simultaneous strengthening of
international institutions to settle disputes and maintain the peace.
It sets forth a series of comprehensive measures which can and should be
taken in order to bring about a world in which there will be freedom
from war and security for all states. It is based on three principles
deemed essential to the achievement of practical progress in the
disarmament field:
First, there must be immediate disarmament action:
A strenuous and uninterrupted effort must be made toward the goal of
general and complete disarmament; at the same time, it is important that
specific measures be put into effect as soon as possible.
Second, all disarmament obligations must be subject to effective international controls:
The control organization must have the manpower, facilities, and
effectiveness to assure that limitations or reductions take place as
agreed. It must also be able to certify to all states that retained
forces and armaments do not exceed those permitted at any stage of the
disarmament process.
Third, adequate peace-keeping machinery must be established:
There is an inseparable relationship between the scaling down of
national armaments on the one hand and the building up of international
peace-keeping machinery and institutions on the other. Nations are
unlikely to shed their means of self-protection in the absence of
alternative ways to safeguard their legitimate interests. This can only
be achieved through the progressive strengthening of international
institutions under the United Nations and by creating a United Nations
Peace Force to enforce the peace as the disarmament process proceeds.
There follows a summary of the principal provisions of the United States Program for General and Complete Disarmament in a Peaceful World. The full text of the program is contained in an appendix to this pamphlet.
SUMMARY
DISARMAMENT GOAL AND OBJECTIVES
The over-all goal of the United States is a free, secure, and
peaceful world of independent states adhering to common standards of
justice and international conduct and subjecting the use of force to the
rule of law; a world which has achieved general and complete
disarmament under effective international control; and a world in which
adjustment to change takes place in accordance with the principles of
the United Nations.
In order to make possible the achievement of that
goal, the program sets forth the following specific objectives toward
which nations should direct their efforts:
- The disbanding of all national armed forces and the prohibition of
their reestablishment in any form whatsoever other than those required
to preserve internal order and for contributions to a United Nations
Peace Force;
- The elimination from national arsenals of all armaments, including
all weapons of mass destruction and the means for their delivery, other
than those required for a United Nations Peace Force and for maintaining
internal order;
- The institution of effective means for the enforcement of
international agreements, for the settlement of disputes, and for the
maintenance of peace in accordance with the principles of the United
Nations;
- The establishment and effective operation of an International
Disarmament Organization within the framework of the United Nations to
ensure compliance at all times with all disarmament obligations.
The negotiating states are called upon to develop the program into a
detailed plan for general and complete disarmament and to continue their
efforts without interruption until the whole program has been achieved.
To this end, they are to seek the widest possible area of agreement at
the earliest possible date. At the same time, and without prejudice to
progress on the disarmament program, they are to seek agreement on those
immediate measures that would contribute to the common security of
nations and that could facilitate and form part of the total program.
GOVERNING PRINCIPLES
The program sets forth a series of general principles to guide the negotiating states in their work. These make clear that:
- As states relinquish their arms, the United Nations must be
progressively strengthened in order to improve its capacity to assure
international security and the peaceful settlement of disputes;
- Disarmament must proceed as rapidly as possible, until it is
completed, in stages containing balanced, phased, and safeguarded
measures;
- Each measure and stage should be carried out in an agreed period of
time, with transition from one stage to the next to take place as soon
as all measures in the preceding stage have been carried out and
verified and as soon as necessary arrangements for verification of the
next stage have been made;
- Inspection and verification must establish both that nations carry
out scheduled limitations or reductions and that they do not retain
armed forces and armaments in excess of those permitted at any stage of
the disarmament process; and
- Disarmament must take place in a manner that will not affect adversely the security of any state.
The program provides for progressive disarmament steps to take place
in three stages and for the simultaneous strengthening of international
institutions.
FIRST STAGE
The first stage contains measures which would significantly reduce
the capabilities of nations to wage aggressive war. Implementation of
this stage would mean that:
- The nuclear threat would be reduced:
All states would have adhered to a treaty effectively prohibiting the testing of nuclear weapons.
The
production of fissionable materials for use in weapons would be stopped
and quantities of such materials from past production would be
converted to non-weapons uses.
States owning nuclear weapons would
not relinquish control of such weapons to any nation not owning them
and would not transmit to any such nation information or material
necessary for their manufacture.
States not owning nuclear
weapons would not manufacture them or attempt to obtain control of such
weapons belonging to other states.
A Commission of Experts would
be established to report on the feasibility and means for the verified
reduction and eventual elimination of nuclear weapons stockpiles.
- Strategic delivery vehicles would be reduced:
Strategic
nuclear weapons delivery vehicles of specified categories and weapons
designed to counter such vehicles would be reduced to agreed levels by
equitable and balanced steps; their production would be discontinued or
limited; their testing would be limited or halted.
- Arms and armed forces would be reduced:
The
armed forces of the United States and the Soviet Union would be limited
to 2.1 million men each (with appropriate levels not exceeding that
amount for other militarily significant states); levels of armaments
would be correspondingly reduced and their production would be limited.
An
Experts Commission would be established to examine and report on the
feasibility and means of accomplishing verifiable reduction and eventual
elimination of all chemical, biological and radiological weapons.
- Peaceful use of outer space would be promoted:
The placing in orbit or stationing in outer space of weapons capable of producing mass destruction would be prohibited.
States would give advance notification of space vehicle and missile launchings.
- U.N. peace-keeping powers would be strengthened:
Measures
would be taken to develop and strengthen United Nations arrangements
for arbitration, for the development of international law, and for the
establishment in Stage II of a permanent U.N. Peace Force.
- An International Disarmament Organization would be established for effective verification of the disarmament program:
Its functions would be expanded progressively as disarmament proceeds.
It
would certify to all states that agreed reductions have taken place and
that retained forces and armaments do not exceed permitted levels.
It would determine the transition from one stage to the next.
- States would be committed to other measures to reduce
international tension and to protect against the chance of war by
accident, miscalculation, or surprise attack:
States
would be committed to refrain from the threat or use of any type of
armed force contrary to the principles of the U.N. Charter and to
refrain from indirect aggression and subversion against any country.
A
U.N. peace observation group would be available to investigate any
situation which might constitute a threat to or breach of the peace.
States
would be committed to give advance notice of major military movements
which might cause alarm; observation posts would be established to
report on concentrations and movements of military forces.
The second stage contains a series of measures which would bring
within sight a world in which there would be freedom from war.
Implementation of all measures in the second stage would mean:
- Further substantial reductions in the armed forces, armaments, and
military establishments of states, including strategic nuclear weapons
delivery vehicles and countering weapons;
- Further development of methods for the peaceful settlement of disputes under the United Nations;
- Establishment of a permanent international peace force within the United Nations;
- Depending on the findings of an Experts Commission, a halt in the
production of chemical, bacteriological and radiological weapons and a
reduction of existing stocks or their conversion to peaceful uses;
- On the basis of the findings of an Experts Commission, a reduction of stocks of nuclear weapons;
- The dismantling or the conversion to peaceful uses of certain military bases and facilities wherever located; and
- The strengthening and enlargement of the International Disarmament
Organization to enable it to verify the steps taken in Stage II and to
determine the transition to Stage III.
During the third stage of the program, the states of the world,
building on the experience and confidence gained in successfully
implementing the measures of the first two stages, would take final
steps toward the goal of a world in which:
- States would retain only those forces, non-nuclear armaments, and
establishments required for the purpose of maintaining internal order;
they would also support and provide agreed manpower for a U.N. Peace
Force.
- The U.N. Peace Force, equipped with agreed types and quantities of armaments, would be fully functioning.
- The manufacture of armaments would be prohibited except for those of
agreed types and quantities to be used by the U.N. Peace Force and
those required to maintain internal order. All other armaments would be
destroyed or converted to peaceful purposes.
- The peace-keeping capabilities of the United Nations would be
sufficiently strong and the obligations of all states under such
arrangements sufficiently far-reaching as to assure peace and the just
settlement of differences in a disarmed world.
DECLARATION ON DISARMAMENT
THE UNITED STATES PROGRAM
FOR GENERAL AND COMPLETE DISARMAMENT
IN A PEACEFUL WORLD
The Nations of the world,
Conscious of the crisis in
human history produced by the revolutionary development of modern
weapons within a world divided by serious ideological differences;
Determined to
save present and succeeding generations from the scourge of war and the
dangers and burdens of the arms race and to create conditions in which
all peoples can strive freely and peacefully to fulfill their basic
aspirations;
Declare their goal to be: A free, secure, and
peaceful world of independent states adhering to common standards of
justice and international conduct and subjecting the use of force to the
rule of law; a world where adjustment to change takes place in
accordance with the principles of the United Nations; a world where
there shall be a permanent state of general and complete disarmament
under effective international control and where the resources of nations
shall be devoted to man's material, cultural, and spiritual advance;
Set forth as the objectives of a program of general and complete disarmament in a peaceful world:
(a)
The disbanding of all national armed forces and the prohibition of
their reestablishment in any form whatsoever other than those required
to preserve internal order and for contributions to a United Nations
Peace Force;
(b) The elimination from national arsenals of all
armaments, including all weapons of mass destruction and the means for
their delivery, other than those required for a United Nations Peace
Force and for maintaining internal order;
(c) The establishment and
effective operation of an International Disarmament Organization within
the framework of the United Nations to ensure compliance at all times
with all disarmament obligations;
(d) The institution of effective
means for the enforcement of international agreements, for the
settlement of disputes, and for the maintenance of peace in accordance
with the principles of the United Nations.
Call on the negotiating states:
(a)
To develop the outline program set forth below into an agreed plan for
general and complete disarmament and to continue their efforts without
interruption until the whole program has been achieved;
(b) To this end to seek to attain the widest possible area of agreement at the earliest possible date;
(c)
Also to seek --- without prejudice to progress on the disarmament
program --- agreement on those immediate measures that would contribute
to the common security of nations and that could facilitate and form a
part of that program.
Affirm that disarmament negotiations should be guided by the following principles:
(a)
Disarmament shall take place as rapidly as possible until it is
completed in stages containing balanced, phased and safeguarded
measures, with each measure and stage to be carried out in an agreed
period of time.
(b) Compliance with all disarmament obligations shall
be effectively verified from their entry into force. Verification
arrangements shall be instituted progressively and in such a manner as
to verify not only that agreed limitations or reductions take place but
also that retained armed forces and armaments do not exceed agreed
levels at any stage.
(c) Disarmament shall take place in a manner
that will not affect adversely the security of any state, whether or not
a party to an international agreement or treaty.
(d) As states
relinquish their arms, the United Nations shall be progressively
strengthened in order to improve its capacity to assure international
security and the peaceful settlement of differences as well as to
facilitate the development of international cooperation in common tasks
for the benefit of mankind.
(e) Transition from one stage of
disarmament to the next shall take place as soon as all the measures in
the preceding stage have been carried out and effective verification is
continuing and as soon as the arrangements that have been agreed to be
necessary for the next stage have been instituted.
Agree upon the following outline program for achieving general and complete disarmament:
STAGE I
A. To Establish an International Disarmament Organization:
(a)
An International Disarmament Organization (IDO) shall be established
within the framework of the United Nations upon entry into force of the
agreement. Its functions shall be expanded progressively as required for
the effective verification of the disarmament program.
(b) The IDO
shall have: (1) a General Conference of all the parties; (2) a
Commission consisting of representatives of all the major powers as
permanent members and certain other states on a rotating basis; and (3)
an Administrator who will administer the Organization subject to the
direction of the Commission and who will have the authority, staff, and
finances adequate to assure effective impartial implementation of the
functions of the Organization.
(c) The IDO shall: (1) ensure
compliance with the obligations undertaken by verifying the execution of
measures agreed upon; (2) assist the states in developing the details
of agreed further verification and disarmament measures; (3) provide for
the establishment of such bodies as may be necessary for working out
the details of further measures provided for in the program and for such
other expert study groups as may be required to give continuous study
to the problems of disarmament; (4) receive reports on the progress of
disarmament and verification arrangements and determine the transition
from one stage to the next.
B. To Reduce Armed Forces and Armaments:
(a)
Force levels shall be limited to 2.1 million each for the U.S. and
U.S.S.R. and to appropriate levels not exceeding 2.1 million each for
all other militarily significant states. Reductions to the agreed levels
will proceed by equitable, proportionate, and verified steps.
(b)
Levels of armaments of prescribed types shall be reduced by equitable
and balanced steps. The reductions shall be accomplished by transfers of
armaments to depots supervised by the IDO. When, at specified periods
during the Stage I reduction process, the states party to the agreement
have agreed that the armaments and armed forces are at prescribed
levels, the armaments in depots shall be destroyed or converted to
peaceful uses.
(c) The production of agreed types of armaments shall be limited.
(d)
A Chemical, Biological, Radiological (CBR) Experts Commission shall be
established within the IDO for the purpose of examining and reporting on
the feasibility and means for accomplishing the verifiable reduction
and eventual elimination of CBR weapons stockpiles and the halting of
their production.
C. To Contain and Reduce the Nuclear Threat:
(a) States that have not acceded to a treaty effectively prohibiting the testing of nuclear weapons shall do so.
(b) The production of fissionable materials for use in weapons shall be stopped.
(c)
Upon the cessation of production of fissionable materials for use in
weapons, agreed initial quantities of fissionable materials from past
production shall be transferred to non-weapons purposes.
(d) Any
fissionable materials transferred between countries for peaceful uses of
nuclear energy shall be subject to appropriate safeguards to be
developed in agreement with the IAEA.
(e) States owning nuclear
weapons shall not relinquish control of such weapons to any nation not
owning them and shall not transmit to any such nation information or
material necessary for their manufacture. States not owning nuclear
weapons shall not manufacture such weapons, attempt to obtain control of
such weapons belonging to other states, or seek or receive information
or materials necessary for their manufacture.
(f) A Nuclear Experts
Commission consisting of representatives of the nuclear states shall be
established within the IDO for the purpose of examining and reporting on
the feasibility and means for accomplishing the verified reduction and
eventual elimination of nuclear weapons stockpiles.
D. To Reduce Strategic Nuclear Weapons Delivery Vehicles:
(a)
Strategic nuclear weapons delivery vehicles in specified categories and
agreed types of weapons designed to counter such vehicles shall be
reduced to agreed levels by equitable and balanced steps. The reduction
shall be accomplished in each step by transfers to depots supervised by
the IDO of vehicles that are in excess of levels agreed upon for each
step. At specified periods during the Stage I reduction process, the
vehicles that have been placed under the supervision of the IDO shall be
destroyed or converted to peaceful uses.
(b) Production of agreed
categories of strategic nuclear weapons delivery vehicles and agreed
types of weapons designed to counter such vehicles shall be discontinued
or limited.
(c) Testing of agreed categories of strategic nuclear
weapons delivery vehicles and agreed types of weapons designed to
counter such vehicles shall be limited or halted.
E. To Promote the Peaceful Use of Outer Space:
(a) The placing into orbit or stationing in outer space of weapons capable of producing mass destruction shall be prohibited.
(b)
States shall give advance notification to participating states and to
the IDO of launchings of space vehicles and missiles, together with the
track of the vehicle.
F. To Reduce the Risks of War by Accident, Miscalculation, and Surprise Attack:
(a)
States shall give advance notification to the participating states and
to the IDO of major military movements and maneuvers, on a scale as may
be agreed, which might give rise to misinterpretation or cause alarm and
induce countermeasures. The notification shall include the geographic
areas to be used and the nature, scale and time span of the event.
(b)
There shall be established observation posts at such locations as major
ports, railway centers, motor highways, and air bases to report on
concentrations and movements of military forces.
(c) There shall also
be established such additional inspection arrangements to reduce the
danger of surprise attack as may be agreed.
(d) An international
commission shall be established immediately within the IDO to examine
and make recommendations on the possibility of further measures to
reduce the risks of nuclear war by accident, miscalculation, or failure
of communication.
G. To Keep the Peace:
(a) States shall reaffirm
their obligations under the U.N. Charter to refrain from the threat or
use of any type of armed force--including nuclear, conventional, or
CBR--contrary to the principles of the U.N. Charter.
(b) States shall agree to refrain from indirect aggression and subversion against any country.
(c)
States shall use all appropriate processes for the peaceful settlement
of disputes and shall seek within the United Nations further
arrangements for the peaceful settlement of international disputes and
for the codification and progressive development of international law.
(d) States shall develop arrangements in Stage I for the establishment in Stage II of a U.N. Peace Force.
(e)
A U.N. peace observation group shall be staffed with a standing cadre
of observers who could be dispatched to investigate any situation which
might constitute a threat to or breach of the peace.
STAGE II
A. International Disarmament Organization:
The
powers and responsibilities of the IDO shall be progressively enlarged
in order to give it the capabilities to verify the measures undertaken
in Stage II.
B. To Further Reduce Armed Forces and Armaments:
(a)
Levels of forces for the U.S., U.S.S.R., and other militarily
significant states shall be further reduced by substantial amounts to
agreed levels in equitable and balanced steps.
(b) Levels of
armaments of prescribed types shall be further reduced by equitable and
balanced steps. The reduction shall be accomplished by transfers of
armaments to depots supervised by the IDO. When, at specified periods
during the Stage II reduction process, the parties have agreed that the
armaments and armed forces are at prescribed levels, the armaments in
depots shall be destroyed or converted to peaceful uses.
(c) There shall be further agreed restrictions on the production of armaments.
(d) Agreed military bases and facilities wherever they are located shall be dismantled or converted to peaceful uses.
(e)
Depending upon the findings of the Experts Commission on CBR weapons,
the production of CBR weapons shall be halted, existing stocks
progressively reduced, and the resulting excess quantities destroyed or
converted to peaceful uses.
C. To Further Reduce the Nuclear Threat:
Stocks
of nuclear weapons shall be progressively reduced to the minimum levels
which can be agreed upon as a result of the findings of the Nuclear
Experts Commission; the resulting excess of fissionable material shall
be transferred to peaceful purposes.
D. To Further Reduce Strategic Nuclear Weapons Delivery Vehicles:
Further
reductions in the stocks of strategic nuclear weapons delivery vehicles
and agreed types of weapons designed to counter such vehicles shall be
carried out in accordance with the procedure outlined in Stage I.
E. To Keep the Peace:
During Stage II, states
shall develop further the peace-keeping processes of the United Nations,
to the end that the United Nations can effectively in Stage III deter
or suppress any threat or use of force in violation of the purposes and
principles of the United Nations:
(a) States shall agree upon
strengthening the structure, authority, and operation of the United
Nations so as to assure that the United Nations will be able effectively
to protect states against threats to or breaches of the peace.
(b) The U.N. Peace Force shall be established and progressively strengthened.
(c)
States shall also agree upon further improvements and developments in
rules of international conduct and in processes for peaceful settlement
of disputes and differences.
STAGE III
By the time Stage II has been completed, the confidence produced
through a verified disarmament program, the acceptance of rules of
peaceful international behavior, and the development of strengthened
international peace-keeping processes within the framework of the U.N.
should have reached a point where the states of the world can move
forward to Stage III. In Stage III progressive controlled disarmament
and continuously developing principles and procedures of international
law would proceed to a point where no state would have the military
power to challenge the progressively strengthened U.N. Peace Force and
all international disputes would be settled according to the agreed
principles of international conduct.
The progressive steps to be taken during the final phase of the
disarmament program would be directed toward the attainment of a world
in which:
(a) States would retain only those forces, non-nuclear
armaments, and establishments required for the purpose of maintaining
internal order; they would also support and provide agreed manpower for a
U.N. Peace Force.
(b) The U.N. Peace Force, equipped with agreed types and quantities of armaments, would be fully functioning.
(c)
The manufacture of armaments would be prohibited except for those of
agreed types and quantities to be used by the U.N. Peace Force and those
required to maintain internal order. All other armaments would be
destroyed or converted to peaceful purposes.
(d) The peace-keeping
capabilities of the United Nations would be sufficiently strong and the
obligations of all states under such arrangements sufficiently
far-reaching as to assure peace and the just settlement of differences
in a disarmed world.
The United States did in fact announce a world police force, and they did it more than 50 years ago. Today it is called NATO.
The above text is copied verbatim from U.S. Department of State Publication 7277, Freedom from War: The United States Program for General and Complete Disarmament in a Peaceful World,
Disarmament Series 5, Office of Public Services, Bureau of Public
Affairs, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C., O 609147.
If you are unfamiliar with this document and don't believe its authenticity, here is a direct link sourced from the United States Senate's official government website.
This document was drafted by former U.S. National Security Advisor
and Secretary of State, Heinz Alfred Kissinger, a German national and
Soviet deep cover agent (code named "Bor") who had changed his birth
name to "Henry" to evade suspicion of his conspiratorial espionage. State Department Publication 7277 was personally delivered to the United Nations by President John F. Kennedy in September of 1961.
It is the official policy of the United States of America, and
reveals the plans of the federal government of the United States to
retroactively transfer its military forces to the United Nations. It
specifically outlines an ongoing agenda to combine the police and
military forces of the United States of America with Russia in three
distinct stages, into what will be the "peace-keeping" forces of the new
world government under the authority of the United Nations bureaucracy.
"The meaning of peace," explained socialist revolutionary Karl Marx, "is the absence of opposition to socialism."
That statement—which I have often cited due to its extreme
importance—holds a lot of weight, because anyone who has made an honest
study of the United Nations knows that it was founded by socialists, and the Charter of the United Nations—an almost word-for-word duplicate of the Constitution of the Soviet Union—was penned by socialists. The truth is, the Charter of the United Nations is slated by its framers to be the "World Constitution."
Ultimately, according to the collectivist plan introduced by the U.S.
State Department, the only military force will be a world police force
under the United Nations in sufficient numbers with state-of-the-art
technology to field overwhelming force against any perceived threat to
the world supra-government. The military of the United States of America
is currently filling the requirement. It is currently in stage two, and
moving into the final stage of the plan.
Understanding the successes to date since the introduction of 7277, the Senior Officer Corps of all of our military forces have betrayed their Oaths of allegiance
to the Constitution for the United States of America, the Supreme Law
of our guaranteed Republican form of government, and have joined the
conspiracy to end our national sovereignty and unite with other U.N.
member states under a totalitarian socialist world government.
"E Pluribus Unum." Out of Many, One.
You see, none of this is new. This subject is what originally
compelled me to write and disseminate information, and I have written
extensively and documented the structural build-up of a tyrannical
military police state/martial law scenario in this country, and
enumerated the punishments for treason as defined in the law [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11].
The particular agenda to create a world police force has been (at
least) 54 years in the planning stages, and probably a long time before
that. Considering this, the record-breaking nationwide Special Forces
domestic operation Jade Helm 15 to "master the human domain" [1][2][3][4],
the U.S. Army Special Operations Command's ARSOF Operating Concept 2022
to "operationalize the CONUS [Continental United States] base" [1][2], the DoD's National Guard State Partnership Program
involving 74 nations around the globe evolving "from a 1991 U.S.
European command decision," the Justice Department's March 12th announcement to federalize local law enforcement [1][2], are all just extensions of the stated long-term agenda of the United States.
And for whatever reason you think this may all be transpiring—whether it be preparations for a forthcoming economic collapse, resulting civil unrest and martial law; a Continuity of Government program of the Pentagon to shore-up defenses in preparation for World War III; a federal takeover of the States and disarming of lawful gun owners, purging of political opponents and military commanders; relocating military infrastructure to avoid a forthcoming earthquake, super-volcano, pole shift, the incoming 3,600-year orbit 10th planet discovered in 1979 by the Pioneer space probe, or other extreme weather event; another
chapter in blurring the lines between the police and military,
desensitizing and normalizing the aberrant shame of a standing army on
the streets of America following the end of Posse Comitatus; an operational test of 4th generation warfare or a giant psychological operation of perception management; or all the above—whatever reason you may attach to this burgeoning police state,
there is no question that it is happening right before our eyes in
accordance with a long-established official framework of documentation,
and obviously for a very specific reason.
Being a veteran of the Armed Forces of the United States, I know that
we train where we fight and fight where we train. This is all taking
place not for training purposes for the future prospect of foreign
deployment, as its public relations arms claim, but for domestic
operations in "unconventional warfare" on U.S. soil. After
all, employing the assistance of "Interagency Partners" (the DHS, FBI,
DEA and local law enforcement) who have no explainable precedent in
foreign war as these agencies have no foreign operating charter, has
no adequate demonstrable convention.
$4.2 billion worth of military surplus has been handed over to local
police forces by the federal government in recent years. My local police
department received a whopping $1.6 million in surplus weapons and military-grade hardware. Many combat veterans have even exclaimed how American cops are more heavily armed than they were as front-line soldiers in active war zones. Hundreds
of millions of taxpayer dollars are being spent annually to outgun the
average American citizen, to position the federal U.S. military forces,
agencies and their auxiliary local and state law enforcement partners
throughout the continental United States to eliminate the opposition of
the United Nations disarmament agenda as their peace-keeping force, and
to prepare for a major event to coincide with multiple flashpoints.
Having discussed this agenda
with every active duty military member, veteran and police personnel I
know, we all agree unanimously that the federal government of the United
States is terrified of We the People getting fed-up, or something else
(or both), and is actively planning in concert with local and state law
enforcement agencies, for some big forthcoming trigger event. And whatever it is, it's imminent.
I hope you are likewise shoring up your defenses, because one thing
is for sure, something big is about to happen that will change our way
of life in this country. If we allow our Creator-endowed Freedom to be
stripped, then we will never get it back. Truthfully, if you aren't
willing to die in the defense of it, then you probably never deserved it
anyway.
And if you are making a
concerted effort to get right with the Almighty, then you know as I do
that you have nothing to fear, for if you die in the defense of God and
of the principles and ideals which blessed this nation with greatness
from its inception, then you will be the only one in the world who is
truly free.
Source
Read more at http://freedomoutpost.com/2015/06/united-states-announces-world-police-force/#SAC1IsZP6ftt3oU8.99
posted by ATTILA at 5:23 PM
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home